<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: paying attention to non-tactile buttons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/</link>
	<description>they distracted us, so now we're distracting you</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Barahona</title>
		<link>http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Barahona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let's leave multi-tasking to computers and focus on few things at the moment ^_^&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;either way, not having tactile feedback on the keyboard is less accesible. Apple is bold to try a one-button phone that uses a touch-screen as input device, but why not use one hard-keyboard on the "back" of the phone?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s leave multi-tasking to computers and focus on few things at the moment ^_^</p>

<p>either way, not having tactile feedback on the keyboard is less accesible. Apple is bold to try a one-button phone that uses a touch-screen as input device, but why not use one hard-keyboard on the &#8220;back&#8221; of the phone?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Viney</title>
		<link>http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Viney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonstandarddeviation.com/2007/01/11/paying-attention-to-non-tactile-buttons/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very thought provoking. As someone who recently switched from years of Windows to OS X, I've definitely been frustrated with the new environment's focus on enabling multitasking. While I love my Mac, I just wish I could get the damn windows to maximize to full screen to help me maintain focus on the task at hand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not a legal expert, but my understanding is that the laws banning use of mobile phones in the U.S. only ban use of phones without a hands-free kit. My original point was meant more as a comment on the iPhone's reliance on visual queues for interaction. It is a strength, as Steve Jobs mentioned, but it might be a potential weakness as well. You know the saying: "With great power comes great responsibility".&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thought provoking. As someone who recently switched from years of Windows to OS X, I&#8217;ve definitely been frustrated with the new environment&#8217;s focus on enabling multitasking. While I love my Mac, I just wish I could get the damn windows to maximize to full screen to help me maintain focus on the task at hand.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not a legal expert, but my understanding is that the laws banning use of mobile phones in the U.S. only ban use of phones without a hands-free kit. My original point was meant more as a comment on the iPhone&#8217;s reliance on visual queues for interaction. It is a strength, as Steve Jobs mentioned, but it might be a potential weakness as well. You know the saying: &#8220;With great power comes great responsibility&#8221;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
